Dallas Darling's article "All Roads Lead To Tehran but not Washington" informs readers that all roads[allies] follow Tehran, not Washington, and she/he also informs readers how the U.S. is constructing a road of diligence and hostility.
Many Egyptian, Chinese, Iraqi, Russian, Afghani, Kazakhs, and UN officials have vistited Tehra, siginging cooperative and traded government. Mohamed Morsi, the president of Egypt, even says Iran to be a "major player" in Tehran. Seen in every town or state in America, there is at least one or more homeless person, and there is many businesses closing down. Dallas expresses this statement when he/she states, "Such liberal behavior, including resolutions passed by the Senate issuing "red lines" and threatening Iran with a "massive attack" when it cannot even solve America's increasing unemployment and poverty and homelessness rates and its enormous debt."
I find it hard to understand whether this article is true, or if the article is merily an opinionate from the author. He/she does not use any sentence "quotes" through out the article, not facts that can prove their statements.
Reading this article, reminds me of my American History class with Mr. Qualls, my history teacher. We have recently been talking about Americas crises and soon to be war with Iran.
Finally Washington will have to recognize and adapt to new policy shifts that acknowledge important and viable and revolutionary Islamic influences, and other parts of the world, and, of course, Iran's Royal Road leading in and out of Tehran's Islamic Republic.
Many Egyptian, Chinese, Iraqi, Russian, Afghani, Kazakhs, and UN officials have vistited Tehra, siginging cooperative and traded government. Mohamed Morsi, the president of Egypt, even says Iran to be a "major player" in Tehran. Seen in every town or state in America, there is at least one or more homeless person, and there is many businesses closing down. Dallas expresses this statement when he/she states, "Such liberal behavior, including resolutions passed by the Senate issuing "red lines" and threatening Iran with a "massive attack" when it cannot even solve America's increasing unemployment and poverty and homelessness rates and its enormous debt."
I find it hard to understand whether this article is true, or if the article is merily an opinionate from the author. He/she does not use any sentence "quotes" through out the article, not facts that can prove their statements.
Reading this article, reminds me of my American History class with Mr. Qualls, my history teacher. We have recently been talking about Americas crises and soon to be war with Iran.
Finally Washington will have to recognize and adapt to new policy shifts that acknowledge important and viable and revolutionary Islamic influences, and other parts of the world, and, of course, Iran's Royal Road leading in and out of Tehran's Islamic Republic.
No comments:
Post a Comment